US Politics

You are currently browsing the archive for the US Politics category.

The Supreme Court upheld the right of members of the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, KS to stage anti-gay protests at military funerals. The 8-1 decision affirmed that even hateful speech is protected by the Constitution.

While I can’t argue with the legal grounds of the decision, that still doesn’t make it right to disrupt a funeral.  The Apostle Paul wrote,

“All things are lawful,” but not all things are beneficial. “All things are lawful,” but not all things build up. (1 Corinthians 10:23)

Gandhi said that freedom and responsibility cannot be separated.

Responsibility includes not trampling on the rights of others – but it also demands a certain level of common decency.  Without that, we cease to be a democracy.

The very premise of these protests is that democracy (the right of the majority to choose) is wrong, that we should be governed not by laws made by men, but by the laws of God – or at least a hand-picked selection of those laws that favor a particular view of society.

Is lack of decency not therefore seditious?  The Supreme Court doesn’t seem to think so.  But I would propose that those who cannot treat others with decency are more dangerous to this nation than all the external enemies we have ever faced.

This graphic representation of the federal budget shows the relative size of spending vs. income. (Meeker image via Polizeros)

In a speech two weeks ago, President Obama proclaimed, “[I]t’s absolutely essential to live within our means…”  – but apparently not on his watch.  His budget proposal would trim the deficit by a staggering (?) 8% – and, he says, reduce the deficit by $1.1 trillion over ten years.  That’s an eventual reduction of 79%, still allowing a huge deficit to increase the national debt – and the final reductions would occur during someone else’s presidency!

Balancing the budget will be no easy task, especially since both parties are afraid to talk about tax increases.  The federal government spends almost half again as much as it brings in.  A $100 billion (8%) reduction proposed by Obama is far more significant than the $60 billion in cuts proposed by the GOP.  Yet neither party has the political will to do what is necessary to bring spending and revenue into balance.

Tags: ,

Fotopedia image.

When in Los Angeles, I stay with a friend who leans to the political left. He listens to Rachael Maddow and hopes that one day Obama will wake up and do the right thing. He’s intelligent enough to realize that the Health Care Reform bill was a scam, yet still clings to the same tired “us” and “them” cliches. He recognizes that with shrinking ratings for Fox News and Glenn Beck, the attention paid to such pseudo-news by MSNBC and Rachel Maddow helps keep the right-wing hate machine alive. Yet he refuses to believe that his own news outlets are just as much a pawn as theirs.

The trouble is, in the absence of a shadow player, the Right-Left divide in this country makes little sense. Why does Fox News spew the vile opinions it does? It only does so because it benefits those who pay its bills: American corporations. Why do MSNBC and its ilk insist on giving Fox, Beck, and even Sarah Palin so much free press? Why do they have an interest in making us afraid of the fringe media?  It must serve someone who pays the bills – and again, the answer is American corporations.

It’s never quite that simple.  I would never argue that Microsoft and Exxon want the same thing.  But they do both have a vested interest in wresting power from the American people.  There are common interests that corporations share in garnering power for corporations at the expense of the natural person.

Fox News lies.  And so do AP and most other corporate media outlets.  The difference is that MSNBC tells lies that its left-leaning audience wants to hear.  AP tells the lies that its centrist readers want to hear.  And Fox tells lies that most of us do not want to hear.

But let’s not stop there.  Many of us would agree witht he bumper sticker that proclaimed, “Bush Lied!”  Now Obama has been caught in a(nother) lie: His administration knew that the guns flowing into Mexico were military grade weapons not available in American gun stores, yet his U.S. Attrorney subtly suggested that gun stores were to blame for the violence.  Why?  Probably not to get major anti-gun legislation enacted, but rather to raise the specter of major anti-gun legislation, causing the Right to froth at the mouth, and reinforcing the idea that it’s those crazy Americans on the other side who are to blame for our problems (not the corporations behind the curtain).

News flash: Fox News is the tool of Corporate America, which wants us to (a) vote for what it wants and (b) stay busy hating each other so we don’t notice who is really pulling the strings.

And so are most other corporate media outlets.

Tags: ,

Sometimes it’s easy to forget we’re a nation at war.  There is no rationing, we see no coffins, we do not live in fear.  Yet there are almost 200,000 American troops in harm’s way in Iraq and Afghanistan, and we’ve spent $800 billion on military activities in Iraq alone.

This tank being transported down Interstate 15 is a reminder of something we rarely see: the ongoing military activity to which our nation has made a huge financial commitment.

Tags:

The Green River area would host the proposed nuke plant. (Wikimedia image)

Utah’s climate and geographical location makes it an excellent location for solar, wind, and geothermal electric power generation – sources which are increasing at the expense of new coal-fired plants.

In this alternative-energy paradise,  one company wants to build a nuclear power plant.  The plant would be located in the Utah desert, and would use over 50,000 acre-feet of Utah’s scarce water.  Proponents argue that the water rights are already available, currently unused.  Yet Utah’s water has already been oversoldDrought and climate change have reduced its availability even further.  If all available water rights were put into use, many aquifers would run dry.

There is some irony in the proposal: Utah recently prevailed in its fight to prevent Italian nuclear waste from being shipped into its borders.  Now, it is considering a nuclear power plant that will produce larger quantities of far more dangerous waste than what it just avoided.  With nowhere to ship the waste, it will be stored here in Utah.

Incidentally, 50,000 acre-feet of water is enough water to cover a square mile with water 78 feet deep – and would weigh over 7 million tons.

Tags: ,

“We can negotiate, we can legislate and then we can litigate. All three arrows are alive and well in the quiver.”

So said Utah Governor Gary Herbert in his State of the State speech last week.  Utah is at the front line of the battle between federal power and state’s rights because more than 70% of the land located in the state is managed by the federal government.

The Fed’s recent decision to consider millions of acres of Utah land for wilderness designation – limiting access and grazing rights – was not welcomed by many Utahns, who would rather see more federal lands turned over for use by citizens of the state.

The Utah State Legislature passed a law last week voiding any such designations that are not approved by the State Legislature, setting the stage for confrontation.  Herbert’s speech, while widely acclaimed in the state, is largely seen by analysts as conciliatory toward the fed.

Tags: ,

Adam Vogel photo.

Our nation is facing a fiscal crisis that is only getting worse.  The over $14 trillion national debt has increased by more than 25% in just the last two years/.  The Congressional Budget Office says it is already nearly two-thirds the size of our national economy…  Year after year, decade after decade, Congress proves that it will not solve this crisis on its own.”

So says a joint letter to Congress by Senators Hatch (R-UT) and Cornyn (R-TX).  And the proposed amendment they attacked proves their point: “Congress… will not solve this crisis on its own.”

NationalJournalDailycom summarizes:

Under the proposal, expected to be unveiled the week of January 25, total spending cannot exceed total receipts; total spending for any fiscal year cannot exceed 20 percent of the gross domestic product of the previous calendar year; and a two-thirds vote would be needed in both chambers to pass legislation that increases taxes. A two-thirds vote would also be required to waive any of the other limits, although the limits may be waived if war is declared or an imminent threat is declared by a joint resolution of Congress.

The president must also submit a balanced budget under the bill.

In other words, no new income, and spending must be cut to meet current revenue.  Which sounds great – if you’re not a big fan of reality.

Here’s the problem: At present, revenue doesn’t even cover the four biggest items in the federal budget: Social Security, Defense, Medicare, and interest on the debt.  Everything else, from school lunches to highway maintenance to foreign aid to disaster relief (remember Katrina?) to farm subsidies to Congressional salaries, is spent on credit.  The federal government in 2009 spent an astounding $1.4 trillion (67%) more than it took in.

Blocking new revenue means that spending must be slashed by 40%.  That’s the equivalent of abolishing all national defense and slashing Social Security to zero, while leaving taxes (including social security taxes) at their present levels.  It’s absurd.  And it’s impossible, at least for all but the most ardent promoters of small government.

Bob at Polizeros has written extensively about California’s budget problems.  They need a supermajority to raise revenues, much like this amendment requires.  The result has been disastrous legislative gridlock – the Legislature has been unable to pass a budget, and the world’s eighth largest economy is on the verge of bankruptcy.

The Hatch-Cornyn Amendment is nothing but a political stunt.  If it did pass, it would reduce our Federal government to the same gridlock California now has.

The Senators’ letter quotes the Chairman of the joint Chiefs of Staff calling our national debt “the most significant threat to our national security.”  I don’t disagree.  But this Amendment would take a bad problem and make it worse.

Tags: ,

“Add it up: If you’re a conservative who questions the war, you want the Japs to beat us in WWII, you caused 9/11, and you want to see the Constitution replaced with Sharia Law. Just like a Liberal! What’s next? First you end the war in Afghanistan, next thing you know, you’re gay marrying Mullah Omar in Red Square.”

I love satire, and Josh Mull (writing on Polizeros) hits the nail on the head satirizing one conservative talking head’s comments about a poll showing that conservatives increasingly oppose the war in Afghanistan– and the talking heads don’t want them to!  Thanks, Josh!

Dear Senator Hatch,

Thank you for your newsletter. I would like to point out that the GOP-proposed spending cuts are barely a rounding error in the bloated federal budget.

The top four line items in the budget are Social Security, defense, Medicare, and interest on the national debt. Revenues from taxes and other sources don’t even cover these four items. That means everything else in the budget, from school lunches and highway maintenance to oil subsidies and foreign aid, is spent on credit. In 2009, the federal government spent an astounding 67% more than it took in– with no realistic expectation that it will ever be paid back.

If I ran my business like that, they would send me to prison for fraud, and rightly so.

Unless the GOP has serious cost-cutting proposals they have not yet disclosed– about $1.4 trillion in cuts would be needed to balance the budget– it is imperative that Congress get serious about raising revenues. Otherwise, both parties are complicit in bankrupting this great nation.

Tags: , ,

Peas in a Pod

(Photo source.)

President Obama’s new chief of staff has been serving as, according to the New York Times,

a top executive at JPMorgan Chase, where he is paid as much as $5 million a year and supervises the Washington lobbying efforts for the nation’s second-largest bank. William M. Daley also serves on the board of directors at Boeing, the giant defense contractor, and Abbott Laboratories, the global drug company, which has billions of dollars at stake in the overhaul…

So the next time someone opines that the President who promised us change is failing to stand up to the banksters, the health care industry, or the military-industrial complex, there really shouldn’t be any question why.

Obama has proven (yet again) that he is a corporatist.

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »