
“The Manger’s purpose was the Cross.” –Seen on a marquis at a Baptist Church in Cedar City, Utah.
One of the most striking things to me about Eliot’s poem, “Journey of the Magi” is that although it clearly centers around the birth of the Christ child, not once is Jesus mentioned. Rather, it is the experience of the maggus himself that is explored: a rebirth that the speaker calls “hard and bitter agony,” comparable to his own death. The conversion experience Eliot portrays is not warm, summery elation, but rather a hard road leading to discomfort with the world around. This is an experience of Christ that challenges, that calls one to change.
There are two major schools of thought in Christianity with respect to Christ. One believes that Jesus was the Son of God sent to die for our sins so that we may be saved. This view is familiar from the opening words of John’s Gospel:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God… And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son…” (John 1:1-2 & 1:14)
And again in the First Letter of John:
“Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God… We know that those who are born of God do not sin, but the one who was born of God protects them, and the evil one does not touch them.” (1John 1:1 & 1:18)
The other school of thought suggests that Jesus came to us not to save us through faith, but to teach us through actions. This considers Jesus’s frequent command to “Pick up your cross and follow me.” It may also be seen in the Letter of James:
“What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.” (James 2:14-17)
These are sometimes distinguished as High Christology and Low Christology– was it Jesus’s godliness or humanity that should be emphasized more? I have also heard them distinguished as “summer” and “winter” Christianity, as the latter tends to lead to a more solitary and difficult path.
To me, the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross means nothing unless Jesus was human. It is his humanity that makes His actions important. He chose to die for what He believed to be right. He suffered as only a mortal being can suffer, He died, and He rose again– despite His mortality, death could not claim Him. And He called us to follow in His footsteps. Surely He was “of God” in a way that I am not. But He called each of us to become more than we are.
The celebration of Jesus’ birth emphasizes the deity of Jesus– it suggests (as the Baptist marquis above confirms) that Jesus was born for the purpose of dying, that He is the sacrificial lamb given to us by God. If that is the case, it relieves me of the responsibility to change. All I need do is believe.
If on the other hand the humanity of Jesus is emphasized– the choice He made in sacrificing himself, and the example He called us to follow– then Christmas as we know it today is pretty irrelevant, at least from a religious standpoint. Jesus’ humanity and actions are worthy of celebration. His birth? Not so much. Christmas serves a valued cultural and economic purpose. But in a religious sense, it seems to discourage us from following in Jesus’ footsteps– the very thing the Christ intended.
Given that “Follow me” is the most prevalent commandment in the New Testament, the celebration of Christmas seems to miss the point.
Recent Comments