Myanmar formerly Burma

You are currently browsing the archive for the Myanmar formerly Burma category.

Harvest! by antwerpenR.
(AntwerpenR photo)

“[Myanmar head general Than Shwe] was saying that after [an election] he will hand over power to civilians. He said when I come back he may be a civilian…That means he’s committed to hand over all power.” –UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

I’ll believe it when I see it.

BBC reports that about 100 monks marched today in Burma. One monk told a reporter,

“We are continuing our protest from last month as we have not yet achieved any of the demands we asked for…”

Also, Human Rights Watch accuses the ruling junta of forcibly recruiting children as young as 10 into the military.  What a nice bunch of guys the generals are.

Tip: Polizeros

After the cameras left, Burma’s military regime sent people door-ro-door to round up participants in the pro-democracy protests.  Now, China, one of the regime’s few friends, has come down hard on its tactics.

In (apparently) unrelated news, Burma’s hardline Prime Minister died today, perhaps leaving an openeing for a more moderate voice.

As governments around the world call for sanctions against the repressive military regime in Burma, India announces plans to invest over $100 million in a Burma port upgrade.  India says it needs the port to ship goods to its landlocked (and terrorist-plagued) northeastern provinces.  But BBC says,

“India supported Burma’s pro-democracy movement until the mid-1990s, when it started improving relations with the junta in an effort to compete with China’s growing influence in Burma. Now it is building roads and railways in western Burma, and its companies are trying to gain access to rich deposits of oil and natural gas.”

Perhaps this is capitalism in action: where there’s a demand, someone will step in to fill it.  For better or worse, the international community has isloated Burma.  China and India have stepped in.  While not agreeing with their actions, in a capitalist world, it might be inevitable that someone take advantage of Burma’s economic opportunity.

Myanmar Senior General Than Shwe(L) and democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi. Suu Kyi will consider positively a heavily conditioned offer to meet the head of the junta, her party said Friday, as a US envoy headed to meet the isolated regime's leaders.(AFP/File)

These AFP file photos picture a dour Senior General Than Shwe and smiling democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.  Ironic coincidence, or intentional commentary?  I wonder.

Global Voices says Burma’s military regime has begun a campaign of intimidation against Buddhist monks.  They’ve tried (somewhat unsuccessfully) to compel senior monks to shame junior monks by focibly disrobing them.  The junta is more practiced at torture, which it is now reportedly applying to monks.  In one case, a monk with wounds on his feet was taken to a hospital, but doctors were ordered not to treat him until he gave up his vows.

This regime has lost any moral authority it ever had.  My prediction: once having entirely severed its responsibility to its constituency, it cannot stand for long.

Tip: Andrew Sullivan, who suggests signing this online petition.  The organization is also raising funds to publish the following ad:

114_feature1_en


naingankyatha photo: “Forming a human chain to protect the monks.”.

My friend at Polizeros posted on “The Hard Lessons” of the Burmese crackdown:

What the Burma monks did was hugely courageous and noble. But they did not have sufficient support to bring down the government… It’s best to pick fights that you can win, especially when dealing with thuggish governments.

Yet reports suggest that events in Burma are not over.  External political pressure has increased, with nations around the world outraged at what the military regime did.  And there are reports of desertions and dissent within in the regime.

In an astounding development, U.N. special envoy Ibrahim Gambari managed to meet not only with the elusive Senior Gen. Than Shwe, leader of the SLORC regime, but twice with detained pro-democracy leader (and Nobel laureate) Aung San Suu Kyi.

Meanwhile, acts of civil disobedience continue in Burma, with AP reporting that households are boycotting the government TV newscast.  In western Burma, Christians have begun pro-democracy protests in soldiarity with the Buddhist monks.  This isn’t over yet.

The hard question is, though, what if it is over?  Were the protests, the lives lost, the present and future suffering of the people, all wasted effort?  A failure?  Or worse, a lost cause that should not have been tried?

The answer depends on whether you believe a just action is wrong if it’s not successful– and whether anything is more valuable than life itself.  In short, whether there is yet room for idealism and hope.

Gandhi said,

“[W]here the means are Clean, there God is undoubtedly present with His blessings And where these three combine, there defeat is tin impossibility for a satyagrahi, whether free or incarcerated, is ever victorious. He is vanquished only when he forsakes truth and non-violence and turns a deaf car to the Inner Voice· If, therefore, there is such a thing as defeat for even a satyagrahi, he alone is the cause of it.”

He was paraphrased for the movie “Gandhi“:

“The function of a civil resistance is to provoke response and we will continue to provoke until they respond or change the law.”

(As far as I can tell, Gandhi never said it quite this way.  YouTube offers a 10 minute segment of the movie that includes this quote, and also a reenactment of the controversial and moving raid on the Dharasana Salt Works. If you haven’t seen the movie lately, Amazon has it.)

In Gandhi’s view of nonviolent resistance, the Burma protests were not only justified, they were successful– but only as one battle in an ongoing quest for change.  They focused world attention on the problem, and they have begun to cause the regime itself to question its own actions.  And they showed that the people of Burma can unite against oppression.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu reportedly said of events in Burma,

“It is so like the rolling mass action that eventually toppled apartheid. God bless all those wonderful brave people. Victory is assured. They are on the winning side, the side of freedom, justice and democracy.”

With persistence and a little luck, the people of Burma may yet prevail– but regardless of the outcome, the courage and sacrifice of the brave men and women of Burma are not misguided.

Soldiers are deployed along the street leading to the Sule Pagoda in Yangon, Myanmar on Monday Oct. 1, 2007. The once-blocked off streets leading to the two big pagodas, Sule and Shwedagon, which were the sites of violent unrest by monks and civilians are now open to traffic. (AP Photo)
AP photo.

“The people are angry but afraid — many are poor and struggling in life so they don’t join the protests anymore.”  –Protester quoted by AP.

The streets of Yangon are quiet now, filled with troops and riot police instead of protesters.  One Norway-based organization estimates that 138 people were killed in the crackdown, and over 6,000 were dertained– 2,400 of them monks.  Daily Mail claims the number killed is “in the thousands.”  Their photos are disturbing.

“People are scared and the general assessment is that the fight is over. We were informed from one of the largest embassies in Burma that 40 monks in the Insein prison were beaten to death today and subsequently burned.” –Swedish Diplomat Liselotte Agerlid, quoted by Daily Mail.

The U.N. Special Envoy, Ibrahim Gambari, was permitted to meet with detained leader Aung San Suu Kyi yesterday, but so far has been unable to meet with senior generals of the regime.  He’d expected to meet with Senior Gen. Than Shwe today, but was instead sent on an “official” government tour of Shan province, his appointment postponed until tomorrow.

Meanwhile, new information continues to surface.   Satellite imagery proves what have been until now only rumors of human rights abuses: entire villages burned to the ground, the people forcibly relocated.  Space Wars (turn on your popup blocker for this site) says the villages were primarily of the Karen ethnic minority.  See also National Geographic‘s article on this satellite imagery.  Andrew Sullivan of The Atlantic links to a short documentary on the SLORC regime’s campaign against the Karen people.

Daily Mail also reports that a chief of military intelligence in Rangoon’s northern region has deserted and is fleeing to Thailand.  His desertion has given hope to many that others in the army may follow.

“I decided to desert when I was ordered to raid two monasteries and force several hundred monks onto trucks. They were to be killed and their bodies dumped deep inside the jungle. I refused to participate in this.”

And Andrew Sullivan reports on rumors that segments of the military have done exactly that– in one location, soldiers actually protected the protesters from police.  (Warning: the lead photo on this post is pretty gruesome.)

The killing of a Japanese tourist by Burmese riot police, shown on Japanese TV (see it on YouTube), may (says Sullivan) cause Japan to put pressure on China, Burma’s only friend.

The best assessment today is that the military regime has gained physical (military) control of the country, but is having to work to maintain political control.  There may yet be hope for change, though it will not come from further protests.  Now it must come from pressure from outside, as well as pressure from inside the army itself.

In this photo made available by the Mandalay Gazette, Myanmar soldiers with their weapons are seen in downtown Yangon, Myanmar, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2007. About 10,000 anti-government protesters gathered in the city Thursday despite a violent crackdown by security forces that drew international appeals for restraint by Myanmar's ruling junta. (AP Photo/The Mandalay Gazette, HO)
AP photo.

“[S]oldiers smashed windows and doors and beat the sleeping monks. Some escaped but hundreds of monks were taken away in military trucks.” –BBC

Following yesterday’s protests, police forcibly entered at least two monasteries, threatened and beat several monks, and arrested more than 300.  Several pro-democracy politicians were also taken into custody.

Today, as an estimated 70,000 people took to the streets, security forces first used tear gas, then fired automatic weapons into crowds of protesters in Myanmar/Burma today.  Reports are confused, but indicate that a number of people were wounded.  BBC says at least one person was killed.

Governments around the world have called on the SLORC regime to negotiate with protesters.  So far, that doesn’t apopear likely.

Which is correct, Myanmar or Burma? 

BBC says technically both are correct– Burma being a spoken word and Myanmar being the formal literary form of the same word.  But these days, each has a particular policial connotation.

« Older entries