
(Whalesalad photo.)
“Americans are swallowing 22 teaspoons of sugar each day, and it’s time to cut way back, the American Heart Association says… [and] a national health survey has shown that boys ages 14 to 18 consume an eye-popping 34 teaspoons of added sugar a day.”
So says an AP report. You have to hunt through the article, though, to find out why the AHA thinks our enormous sugar intake is a problem: it’s about the calories. Either we’re eating too many, contributing to obesity, or we’re cutting back on more nutritious food, shorting ourselves essential nutrients. Either way, sugar is an additive we don’t need– at least not in such abundance.
AHA says we should examine our diet. A 12 oz soft drink adds 8 tsp of sugar and 133 calories. But what AHA doesn’t say is that the most popular size isn’t 12 ounces– it’s a 20-ounce bottle or a 64-ounce fountain drink. Down one of the latter and you’ve consumed 43 tsp of sugar and added over 700 calories to your daily diet. For the average woman, that’s 39% of the recommended calorie intake for the day. For men, it’s 32%. So unless you’re in the market for a new, larger wardrobe, you’ll need to skip something else.
By the way, many sodas contain caffeine, an addictive drug that can give you a splitting headache if you stop consuming it. Sure, some people drink cola for the buzz. But be sure to read the ingredients contained in your favorite soda: even one major brand of orange soda contains caffeine. Coincidence, or are they seeking to ensure your continued consumption?
There’s an aspect of the problem that goes beyond diet: our government subsidizes our sugar consumption. It spent $41.8 billion over ten years (1995-2004) to subsidize corn production. Much of the corn we consume directly is in the form of high fructose corn syrup, which accounts for half of all added sugars in the food we eat.
Why does so much corn get made into sugar instead of tortillas? Why does it serve to make rich people fat, instead of keeping poor people alive? It’s not by accident. Says Steven L. Hopp in Barbara Kingsolver’s Animal, Vegetable, Miracle (p. 19),
“Food sellers prefer to market more food to people who have money, rather than those who have little.”
That’s basic accounting: people who have money will pay far more for the same product than people who don’t. Witness: When I first went to Sri Lanka in 1993, a loaf of bread cost $1.00 here in the U.S., but cost only 3 cents in Sri Lanka. Where would you rather sell your bread?
Still, as argi-business has grown ever larger, it has also gained power in Washington. Not only do corporate farmers sell us food that’s not good for us, they get our own government’s financial support to do so!
Tomorrow: an alternative to sugar addiction.
Recent Comments