The Economic Stimulus Game: Reductio Absurdum

President George W. Bush signed into law today the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (H.R. 5140).  The wording is unusually complicated, intelligible only to tax lawyers.  However, in going over it paragraph by paragraph with a CPA coworker, we've determined that the rebate process appears to work as follows:

  1. The Bill sets up rules for calculating a credit toward your 2008 taxes.
  2. You get a rebate based on applying the same rules to your 2007 taxes.
  3. In 2008, the credit is reduced by the amount of the rebate you receoved (but not below zero).
The wording of the bill appears to indicate that if, for example, you qualified for a $1,200 rebate based on 2007, but in 2008 you earned more income and your credit got phased out because of AGI limitations, you would owe that money back.  Ouch!  It's not at all clear what would happen if you didn't get a credit because you made less money than in 2007.  It would be monumentally unfaor to require such a person to pay back their "overpayment"— but the bill just doesn;t appear to address the issue.

Aside from the complications invloved, AP 
expresses doubts about the effectiveness of the package:

"A recent Associated Press-Ipos poll indicates most people have other plans. Forty-five percent said they planned to pay off bills, while 32 percent said they would save or invest it. Only 19 percent said they would spend their rebates."

Could this be a blatant attempt for incumbent lawmakers to woo voters?

Oh, and the House of Representatives 
introduced a bill (H.R. 977) yesterday (which got sent to committee) for the purpose of stating:

"That the House of Representatives encourages Americans to use their rebate checks from the stimulus package to purchase American-made goods and services from American-owned companies."

It appears the politicians are having a field day hoping you'll believe they're actually doing something.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.